Nimimerkki Chiller'in messu Kuppalehen keskustelussa:
https://keskustelu.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/keskustelu/thread.jspa?threadID=257291&tstart=0&start=4605Sample:
Huawein dumppaus meininki on ollut EU:n käsittelyssä aiemminkin, mutta se selvisi ilman sanktioita - operaattoreille oli tärkeämpää voittaa kilpailijat puoli-ilmaisilla verkkolaitteilla.
"Concerns about Huawei’s tactics have existed for years. In 2010, European Union Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht opened a probe of Huawei’s anti-competitive practices.
“It was clear that Huawei was dumping,” recalled De Gucht, explaining that the company was selling its products for less than what it cost to produce them. “We had ample proof. And we came to the conclusion that this was detrimental to the long-term future and prospects of our European companies.”
Though it never published its results, the commission concluded that
Huawei was underbidding competitors by up to 70 percent, De Gucht said.In 2013, he cited Huawei for violating anti-dumping and anti-subsidy guidelines. To De Gucht’s chagrin, though, European companies did not support the commission’s probe. They had business interests in China, and some firms were more intent on taking over their competition than cooperating in an investigation.
The probe was ended in 2014 without punitive measures."
Tuleeko Nokia Oyj:n yli 150-vuotinen historia päätökseensä kommunisti "pandanaamojen" dumppauksen takia?
(Lisäys) Pakko myöntää että Huawein patenttivarkauksiin vahvasti nojaavat tuotteet ovat hinta/laatu -suhteeltaan kenties
ylivoimaisia. Siskolla on HW:n alle kolmensadan kapula; ainakin näytön osalta se on todella huikea!
